GCHQ: Surveillance and controversy

What is GCHQ?

Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is one of three British intelligence agencies. Working alongside the Security Service (MI5) and the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), GCHQ has two purposes. The first concerns information security and to this end the agency works to protect the integrity of government systems, data and information. This function is performed by the Communications Electronic Security Group (CESG).
The second is much more controversial and involves eavesdropping on electronic communications. This function is known as Signals Intelligence (SIGNET) and the process involves intercepting all manner of communications in order to gather and develop intelligence. It is this second function of GCHQ which has been called into question lately and this has been covered widely in the media. GCHQ is to Britain what the National Security Agency is to the US. Both are heavily engaged in controversial signals intelligence and both are currently having to answer to a lot of questions.

But what exactly does GCHQ do?

Think of GCHQ in its SIGNET role as being like a huge filter. All manner of communications from text messages to Xbox live communications are tapped into and monitored by the organisation. The important bits of information are then filtered out and developed into intelligence.

So what’s all the fuss about?

What is proving controversial is the extent and depth of this eavesdropping and politicians on both sides of the pond are denying any such knowledge of these apparently unsanctioned and highly intrusive surveillance programs. This has been very controversial in the US where citizens rights and liberties are safeguarded by the Constitution. The NSA has shown itself to be completely unaccountable and naturally Americans are not best pleased. Unlike in the UK, the US has a written Constitution which entrenches and safeguards individuals rights and liberties. This is taken very seriously by both the government and citizens alike. Subsequently the NSA has not supposed to be spying on its own citizens indiscriminately and as such is facing a lot of criticism. Unfortunately the NSA has further shown itself to be highly controversial by tapping in to the phones of world leaders. Evidently President Obama himself had been unaware that the NSA had tapped the phone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and this clearly caused some embarrassment. In the UK GCHQ are also facing a bit of a grilling, particularly regarding its highly secret surveillance program ‘Tempora’. And no I’m not talking about deep fried prawns!

So what’s all this about finger snacks?

Tempora (not to be confused with the delightful tempura) came to light following revelations made by the disillusioned NSA contractor Edward Snowden. Snowden exposed GCHQ for tapping into the network of fibre optic cables carrying digital traffic around the world. This meant that they had been listening in on private communications including everything from phone calls to Facebook messages. According to the Guardian this sensitive and personal information is stored for up to 30 days where it is sifted through and analysed. Like in the US the legitimacy of this operation is questionable as the Guardian points out ”This is all being carried out without any form of public acknowledgement or debate”. Furthermore, Tempora has been collecting personal information through this process for the past 18 months and GCHQ has been passing this information on to the NSA. They go on to point out that this information includes “recordings of phone calls, the content of email messages, entries on Facebook and the history of any internet user’s access to websites – all of which is deemed legal, even though the warrant system was supposed to limit interception to a specified range of targets”. When you consider this intrusiveness there again arises moral and legal issues which need to be discussed.

Is this legal?

Well this is the million dollar question. GCHQ would argue that they are only interested in specified targets and that particular trigger words alert them to possible lines of intelligence. For example, terrorists and foreign agents who would pose a serious threat to national security would be legitimate surveillance targets and legally they are authorised to carry out warranted surveillance on such targets. In England any covert surveillance is subject to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) and GCHQ is fully accountable to this legislation. Clearly however such widespread and indiscriminate surveillance is going to be difficult to justify and on this basis QCHQ may struggle to justify its actions. Human rights also need to be considered. For example Article 8 of the Human Rights Act (right to respect for your private life, your family life, your home and your correspondence) raises serious issues surrounding breaches in privacy. Again, GCHQ will have to be sure that they are are not in breach of this important legislation and may struggle to do so. It is possible that both GCHQ and the NSA have got around these legal challenges by working together. Of course either agency will not be bound by the others domestic legislation. In essence It appears that GCHQ and the NSA have been spying on each other’s citizens so as to not breach their own domestic privacy laws. Either way both organisations are being held to account and we may see new laws being passed as a result.

Since when did terrorists play video games?

In an apparent attempt to think outside the box and target a new source of intelligence both the NSA and GCHQ have reportedly been targeting online gaming communities. Xbox Live for example has an impressive membership of 48 million users and according to the NSA (reported by the Guardian) could provide a target rich communications network. Moreover “Given that gaming consoles often include voice headsets, video cameras, and other identifiers, the potential for joining together biometric information with activities was also an exciting one”. Bizarrely both agencies are thought to have sent virtual agents into gaming communities (such as that of the virtual World of Warcraft) with the hope of intercepting communications between possible targets and gathering intelligence. It all seems a little far fetched but apparently there is no limit to the levels of surveillance being conducted by both agencies.

Personally I think we need to look at the world in which we live in before we pass too much criticism. It is vitally important that both GCHQ and the NSA stay at the cutting edge of technology so that they can continue to safeguard national security and keep us all safe. After all, the enemies of the state will attempt to use technology to their own advantage and it is as such that our intelligence agencies need to maintain a competitive edge. Whilst we may feel our liberties are being eroded I feel it is important we make these sacrifices for the greater good. If you have nothing to hide then I guess you have nothing to worry about.

For further information regarding GCHQ, the NSA and surveillance check out: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/gchq


3 thoughts on “GCHQ: Surveillance and controversy”

  1. I hear what u say about sacrificing for the greater good, but politely disagree. I come from California (America) and without going into any detail I will simply say Americans have been sick of the government my entire life. I’m 32 and sadly can’t recall a time when the kids REALLY respected the government. We’ve been seeing oppression for a long time. Little things like pot legalization (a dried herb for goodness sake), to these wars that never end and no one wins, to Obama’s czars

    Now NSA.
    We’re sick of this sht u know? It’s Bush. It’s Obama. It’s Governor Christie and Hillary Clinton.

    I think we’re used to the bombs going off by now and it’s just how Americans are wired, we want to be Free and not have to question it

    Seatbelt laws so YOU can tell ME how not to die
    bike helmet laws

    Next will be a hold momma’s hand til you’re 34 law

    Dare me to break it?!

    “No stepping off the sidewalk Billy”

    Irk. I’d rather hear an explosion

      1. Hey. I really enjoyed your article. Where are you guys from? Also I used to share your opinion. And it makes sense too. I think it’s just that it would seem our (the United States) government is just reaching so far. Much further than we the people were even considering… That it’s hard to go back to giving them another chance to fix it. They don’t appear to want to correct themselves. They wish to enter our kids’ video game world (and most adults lol).

        But, yes, if I had to be rational and sensible, of course, we can’t just have explosions going off everywhere and I know the NSA has certainly saved lives

        So, where do u draw the line

        I think it would be great if the government as a whole just said “We’ve gone too far” and actually pulled back a little. Just enough. Enough to save lives without spareing sanctity

        But if they admitted that the people would gut them, everyone who we felt knew anything. I know that much. Just the way it works here. We put up with way too much, most of us. For really much too long

        But, I don’t know where you’re from-maybe Kentucky-but in America it feels like something is about to hit the fan
        Excluding nobody

        I’ll be back to your site for sure. Great read!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s